Humans r definitely, in many ways, no different than beasts I guess. Merit is no where seen, but by exploiting connections, positioning, by force or whatever it takes… Once at the top, v r already comfortable I guess with calling ourselves animals. The Matthew Effect, where success is limited to unfair cycles, keeps goin while I see people struggling despite their potential. It’s a reality de world is rewardin de people borned lucky… talent iz a waste.
I reckon the similarity between us and animals (such as sharing very similar traits) is because we, believed by many, have been evolved from animals. Of course, we are also very different from animals in many senses, like since 3 million years ago during the Stone Age we were already evolved to know how to walk. As societies continued to evolve, we developed into civilised settings. Yet, when understanding why humans live under the social hierarchy, studying the ecosystem of animals helps us look at traits of animals that might be indicative to suggest why humans rank our own selves and why humans want to climb up the social ladder. Random people may casually say because some humans are greedy. Well, I rather see greed as a facilitator + one of the outcomes while understanding why humans intuitively form social ranking is the origin of the issue/phenomenon - which is discussed in my blog post.
Humans fall under the animal kingdom, so it’s obvious they’ll show their true colours. But what concerns me more I guess r de other things mentioned in this blog lyk Is charisma more influential?? How do different cultures impacts?? How merit & social status is inter connected?? Do u think ur Mather effect is fair deal? & greed is a game changer I guess & yes every thing is discussed already thanks ur article is covering everything ma shaAllah 🌸
Charisma is actually a key element of how people in the room are ranked… I am not sure about the situations in certain regions, such as countries that follow dictatorship… but in democratic societies, across the industries, those having charisma is a form of soft power that can easily win other people’s heart as a promising leader. In my article, I mention formal and informal hierarchies… charisma doesn’t belong to formal hierarchy, but those who have charisma and, as mentioned in research, whether we like it or not, those who have better accent, certain racial/ethnic identities and better interpersonal skills are all components of charisma that help people rank higher in informal hierarchy…
Humans r definitely, in many ways, no different than beasts I guess. Merit is no where seen, but by exploiting connections, positioning, by force or whatever it takes… Once at the top, v r already comfortable I guess with calling ourselves animals. The Matthew Effect, where success is limited to unfair cycles, keeps goin while I see people struggling despite their potential. It’s a reality de world is rewardin de people borned lucky… talent iz a waste.
I reckon the similarity between us and animals (such as sharing very similar traits) is because we, believed by many, have been evolved from animals. Of course, we are also very different from animals in many senses, like since 3 million years ago during the Stone Age we were already evolved to know how to walk. As societies continued to evolve, we developed into civilised settings. Yet, when understanding why humans live under the social hierarchy, studying the ecosystem of animals helps us look at traits of animals that might be indicative to suggest why humans rank our own selves and why humans want to climb up the social ladder. Random people may casually say because some humans are greedy. Well, I rather see greed as a facilitator + one of the outcomes while understanding why humans intuitively form social ranking is the origin of the issue/phenomenon - which is discussed in my blog post.
Humans fall under the animal kingdom, so it’s obvious they’ll show their true colours. But what concerns me more I guess r de other things mentioned in this blog lyk Is charisma more influential?? How do different cultures impacts?? How merit & social status is inter connected?? Do u think ur Mather effect is fair deal? & greed is a game changer I guess & yes every thing is discussed already thanks ur article is covering everything ma shaAllah 🌸
Charisma is actually a key element of how people in the room are ranked… I am not sure about the situations in certain regions, such as countries that follow dictatorship… but in democratic societies, across the industries, those having charisma is a form of soft power that can easily win other people’s heart as a promising leader. In my article, I mention formal and informal hierarchies… charisma doesn’t belong to formal hierarchy, but those who have charisma and, as mentioned in research, whether we like it or not, those who have better accent, certain racial/ethnic identities and better interpersonal skills are all components of charisma that help people rank higher in informal hierarchy…
Yup that’s true.. skills n expertises ultimately lead to confidence and charisma..and talented people have diz edge..